On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 16:16, Mark Hammond <mhamm...@skippinet.com.au>wrote:
> [Brett writes] > > > I guess I didn't make it clear enough in the survey. This is meant to > gauge > > whether you think the DVCSs would be improvement over the status quo for > us, > > which happens to be svn. I have changed the options to make it a > comparison > > against the status quo and not svn specifically. If anyone wants to > change > > their vote based on this clarification let me know and I will delete your > > initial answers. > > I'm afraid the above explanation still isn't quite clear to me: you are > saying that we are actually voting on if we would 'approve' of an actual > move of Python's SVN to that named DVCS? > Basically, yes. If I said, "we are switching to XXX", would you be grumbling about it because you thought svn was better, happy because you think it would be an improvement or svn, or just shrug your shoulders at it. > > If so, please do withdraw my vote; I need to think more about that... Deleted. But this is for me to make a more informed decision; there is obviously not enough in this to lead to a switch being made purely on the voting results. At best a DVCS will be taken out of the running because it was consistently disliked. -Brett
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
