Le jeudi 26 février 2009 à 17:10 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit : > This is probably a matter of Internet connection bandwidth then.
Not really. To give a point of comparison, when I clone (using Mercurial) the Python trunk at http://code.python.org/hg/trunk, it takes 2 minutes 50 seconds. That's for the whole trunk history from 1990 to today, and bandwidth is around 500 KB/s (sustained) during the downloading. So, having svnmerge take one minute or more from a machine hosted at the same place as code.python.org points to a really slow merge implementation IMO. > I have no idea how much data gets transferred, but it doesn't > "feel" slow. It definitely feels slow when you merge from e.g. trunk to py3k. > IMHO, those are all feel-good factors which can easily be had by > installing a local Subversion repo copy (sync'ed using svnsync (*)), > except perhaps regarding merging - but I don't know anything about > in what way the DVCSes are better than Subversion. I've never used svnsync, but I have already tried svk and it was a PITA (that's what led me to try Mercurial, and then write hgsvn). _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
