> Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> and that it takes forever > > Not sure about that - I *do* port my own changes, and while the merges > are quicker than a full recompile or running the test suite, they're > still far, far, slower than applying an equivalent patch or doing an svn > update.
I meant that as a relative qualification indeed (merging a single revision specified on the command line as opposed to merging all available versions). I just measured merging r70081, and it took 42s. > Given that "svnmerge block" is pretty slow as well, my suspicion is that > the property calculations and the auto-generation of the commit message > are less than lightning fast. (I don't how much that could be improved > by speeding up the underlying svn metadata retrieval - wasn't the server > updated to svn 1.5 fairly recently?) Indeed. However, I had not upgraded the repository itself. I did now "svnadmin upgrade", and "svn-populate-node-origins-index" on the projects repository. Unfortunately, the same merge operation now takes 2m42. So I reverted the format upgrade (I had made a tar file before). If anybody wants to experiment with that: help would be appreciated. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers