On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: .. > All mainline history has been kept, as well as "active" feature branches > (feature branches someone asked to be kept) (*). I don't know if > Alexander's changesets are part of that, since he didn't precise where > they were made in the SVN repos (if they were made in the sandbox, > chances are they weren't). > > (*) Look at "history management" for more information: > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0385/#history-management
It is possible that I did not pay enough attention during hg migration discussions, but I don't remember seeing any call for feature branches to be preserved. Did anyone ever post a list of feature branches to be dropped during hg migration? How would developers know that they would need to "opt-in" for their work to be preserved? Given the unforgiving nature of hg when it comes to altering history, I don't think sufficient notice was given when the decision to trim the history was made. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
