On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> On mar., 2014-01-07 at 13:18 -0800, Eli Bendersky wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Does it really make sense to introduce large amounts of code churn > > after the release of 3.4 beta2? It started innocently enough, but now > > it seems that the whole implementation is being reconsidered > > (Antoine's email to pydev). This doesn't look like something we should > > be doing so late in the release process. > > > > Are we really that much in need of convert-to-clinic *now*? > > I guess the question is: are there large enough benefits to be reaped > for risking the release (a bit)? > There's no question Argument Clinic can bring interesting benefits, it's > just a question of timing. > Just to be clear, this is exactly what I mean. I'm not saying AC is not worth it; I'm questioning the timing. Eli
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
