On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Larry Hastings <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01/07/2014 03:10 PM, A.M. Kuchling wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:37:22PM -0800, Eli Bendersky wrote: > > Just to be clear, this is exactly what I mean. I'm not saying AC is not > worth it; I'm questioning the timing. > > Agreed; let's try to avoid far-ranging sets of changes so late in the > beta cycle. > > If we want to send 3.4 back to alpha and implement some form of > string-formatting changes and Argument Clinic, that would be fine, > though it might mean Ubuntu and other Linux distros might have to ship > with 3.3 again because 3.4 wasn't done in time. > > > I hadn't considered slipping the release, but that does seem like an > entirely sane idea. However, I'm not proposing slipping back to alpha so > we can add the cause-celebre-of-the-week bytes formatting stuff, and we > don't need to slip all the way back to alpha for Argument Clinic. A third > beta seems entirely reasonable though. Let's try the derby for a couple of > days and see how we feel. > > +1
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
