On 1/7/2014 9:35 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 01/07/2014 06:06 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:

Addressing the key remaining barriers to migration for existing Python
2 users would be an excellent objective to attain before we end
upstream support for Python 2.7, but it's one that would be better
addressed by a slightly shorter dev cycle than normal for 3.5 than it
would be by falling into the "just one more feature" trap for Python 3.4.


I was thinking about that myself.  If we said in advance what features
we were shooting for, and it wasn't overly ambitious, we could do a
release in six months.  No problem.

Do we know of any (other) big projects waiting to happen for 3.5?

Integration of regex module?

And has a consensus about byte formatting really coalesced that quickly?

I don't think so. Guido suggested a minimal method and I coded a Python version of a version of that. But many would like *their* favorite feature added. I would like to see a new method tested by, say, mercurial. I also think there are separate questions as to what we want in 3.x for writing 3.x code and what in needed for writing polyglot 2 and 3 code. If the requirements are not the same, I think multi-version modules on Pypi (existing and planned) may in some cases be the better way to go.

Terry


_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers

Reply via email to