On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 06:35:59 -0800, Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:14 AM, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com>wrote: > > > On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 05:49:56 -0800, Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > do the latter in Python, which carries a problem we'll probably need to > > > resolve first - how to know that the bots are green enough. That really > > > needs human attention. > > > > By "that needs human attention", do you mean: dealing with the remaining > > flaky tests, so that "stable buildbots are green" is a binary decision? > > We strive for that now, but Nick's proposal would mean we'd have to > > finally buckle down and complete the work. I'm sure we'd make some new > > flaky tests at some point, but in this future they'd become show-stoppers > > until they were fixed. I think this would be a good thing, overall :) > > > > Non-flakiness of bots is a holy grail few projects attain. If your bots are > consistently green with no flakes, it just means you're not testing enough > :-)
How does OpenStack do it, then? I haven't actually looked at Zuul yet, though it is on my shortlist. --David _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers