On 25 May 2016 at 01:28, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-05-24 15:42 GMT+02:00 R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com>: >> PS: with respect to Victor's script wish, one of the reasons I'm suggesting >> paul.j3 is that very few of his patches have been committed, and they >> should be. > > Oh, it looks like a chicken-and-egg issue. We are not enough > reviewers, but we need reviews to get new reviewers? :-)
Hence the focus on current core developers in https://docs.python.org/devguide/motivations.html#goals-of-this-page rather than any of the other roles involved in the development process - without investment in increasing core developer availability and in making more effective use of core developers' time, funneling more patches to the bottleneck faster currently just increases the backlog of unreviewed patches rather than increasing the number of fixes and improvements actually applied :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
