On 25 January 2017 at 10:19, M.-A. Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> wrote:
> Perhaps making the last minor version to a major release version
> as we did with 2.7 is a good approach, i.e. we'd switch the
> major number when cutting an LTS release and follow similar
> guidelines as we have for 2.7 for this 3.x LTS release.

It also takes about that long for *idiomatic* expectations to change -
Python 2.7 code written by someone that learned Python 3 first is
likely to look quite different from code written by someone that
started with 1.5.2 or one of the earlier 2.x releases.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncogh...@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to