2017-01-21 20:51 GMT+01:00 Brett Cannon <br...@python.org>: > What I'm picking up from this is (as a gross oversimplification): > > * Victor _wants_ code reviews > * Raymond thinks we _need_ code reviews
For a concrete example, I wrote a patch for a major regression in the datetime module at 2017-01-04: http://bugs.python.org/issue29100 I'm waiting for a review. To be honest, I almost forgot this issue since I didn't get any feedback. I didn't get any review. In the meanwhile, a duplicate was opened: http://bugs.python.org/issue29346 Usually, when this case occurs, I push my patch without review. But since some developers wrote that the want to review, please take a look at timestamp_limits.patch of http://bugs.python.org/issue29100 ! "timestamp_limits.patch is waiting for your review! This issue is a major regression of Python 3.6. I'm going to push the patch in one week if I don't get any review." Victor _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
