-1, I think, though I'm frustrated that in the parts of the list discussion I had energy to read, its proponents seemed to be saying that the most compelling examples aren't actually in the PEP (and I don't know what they are).
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 2:49 AM, Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment > Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the > talk at the Language Summit: > > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/ > > The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices: > > * +1: you like the PEP > * -1: you dislike the PEP > * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon > * don't reply to this poll :-) > > Just reply to this email with "+1", "0", "-1". Please don't elaborate > here, it's just a quick poll, use python-dev if you want to talk :-) > > The poll will end next Tuesday, May 8, the day before the Language Summit. > > I propose a poll because I'm unable to track the opinion of each core > dev, too many emails have been sent to python-dev, and maybe some > people changed their mind during the long discussion (which started in > February) :-) > > Note: Obviously, it's just a poll, not a vote. Guido van Rossum is the > one who will pronounce himself on the PEP, to accept to reject it, so > the only one allowed to vote ;-) > > Victor > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/