Thanks Ethan for clarifying. Totally cool if that is the case. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 10:19 PM Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> On 07/18/2018 09:40 PM, Carol Willing wrote: > > I am in favor of a time limit. Yet, October 1 seems a bit too long for > the initial governance decision (i.e. how to > > decide how to decide). My perspective, based on transitions in > non-profits and the corporate world, is that the longer > > an organization let's it draw out then fear, uncertainty, and doubt > creep in. > > > > We have PEP 10 in place for a strawperson vote. It seems as good as > anything to use to determine how to make a decision. > > Perhaps set a 30 day deadline to submit decision process > recommendations. Then take a strawperson poll on each and at > > the core sprint create a time window for specific proposals on structure > be submitted before October 1. > > > > My concern if we leave how to decide until at least Oct 1 that the > likelihood of completing this year is fairly low. > > My understanding is that, between now and Oct 1, we'll all get our > proposals together for both how to decide, and what > to decide. Then we have the first vote to decide how to decide, then > maybe a week or two later we use that mechanism to > decide on a governance model. > > -- > ~Ethan~ > > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
