FYI I just updated PEP 8001 with the result of the poll which very clearly favoured the Condorcet method for winner selection.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 12:52, Tim Peters <tim.pet...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's a poll about the voting method to use to decide on the winning > governance PEP. We'd like to see more people weigh in: > > https://discuss.python.org/t/python-governance-electoral-system/290/26 > > PEP 8001 specifies that IRV will be used. There's pushback against > that. Since a poll is a form of approval voting, there's also > pushback against using a poll to vote on the voting method. But we > really don't have the time to pursue infinite regress to its end ;-) > > I'm not in charge of anything, so take this for what it's worth: pick > the option(s) that are closest to what you can live with, but add a > comment to the poll if there's some aspect of what you vote for that > you really can't abide (e.g., at least one person said they would vote > for Approval, _except_ that they object to getting the PSF Board > involved in case there's a tie). The high-order bit of this poll is > about the basic approaches people can live with, not details of how > problem cases are handled. > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
