Le jeu. 15 nov. 2018 à 13:55, M.-A. Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> a écrit : > I find it rather unusual that we are pushed to vote on PEPs > which will just have been finished in writing tonight.
Well, denying to modify PEPs during the PEP is the only reliable solution to prevent PEP authors to modify their PEP :-) IMHO latest changes (that I saw) in the governance PEPs are "minor", they don't change fundamentally the governance model. > Shouldn't people who were not involved in the individual creation > processes at least get two weeks to review the final work > to make up their mind before entering a voting period ? Two weeks is the duration of the vote. It isn't enough to review PEPs? Most PEPs have been written one month ago, if not longer. > For the people who have been heavily involved in the PEP creations > this may seem unnecessary, but this is just small subset of the > core developers. I guess that many people will not start reading the governance PEPs until they really have to :-) I'm not sure that postpone the vote would help. > BTW: Thank you for writing up the comparison. I hope you have > updated to the resp. final versions of the PEPs as well :-) You're welcome. Yes, I already updated everything :-) Hopefully, other PEP authors are also keeping this comparison up to date! Victor _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
