Oops, sorry. I meant to include mention of that issue in my previous
email. I agree that it should be fixed for 3.3.
Jim
Jeff Robbins wrote:
I'd really like to see MODPYTHON-195 fixed with what I've tested. It is
a WIN32-only bug and fix. Restart of Apache on Win32 leaks one event
handle every time if the fix is not applied. We have to run on Windows
(long story there) and need to run long term leak-free.
Thanks,
Jeff
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Gallacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <python-dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 4:35 PM
Subject: Are we ready for a 3.3 beta?
It sure feels like we are close thanks to Graham's hard work. I've
been doing some testing and it's looking good.
With 3.3.0-dev-20061104 (r471260):
+1 Linux Debian 3.1 Stable, Apache 2.0.54 (prefork-mpm), python 2.3.5
+1 Linux Debian 3.1 Stable, Apache 2.0.54 (prefork-mpm), python 2.4.1
+1 Linux Ubuntu 6.06, Apache 2.0.55 (worker-mpm), python 2.4.3
+1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (prefork-mpm), python 2.4.4c1
+1 Linux Debian unstable, Apache 2.2.3 (worker-mpm), Python 2.3.5
+1 Linux Debian unstable, Apache 2.2.3 (worker-mpm), Python 2.4.4
+1 Linux Debian unstable, Apache 2.2.3 (worker-mpm), Python 2.5
I'm assuming we are *officially* dropping python 2.2 support, but it
does still work as long as you are using the legacy importer.
Also, I wonder if we should bump the apache version required to
2.0.54, or at least note in the docs that we haven't done any testing
for version < 2.0.54 (or 2.0.53 as the case may be).
Anyway, are there any burning issues that need to be addressed beyond
a couple of documentation tweaks? If not I'll roll a tarball for
preliminary testing and if all goes well we can proceed to a beta
release cycle in fairly quick order.
Jim