On Apr 9, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Michael Hudson wrote:
"Gregory P. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Under "Limitations and Exclusions" it specifically disowns responsibility for worrying about whether Py_Initialize() and PyEval_InitThreads() have been called:
[snip quote]
This suggests that I should call PyEval_InitThreads() in initreadline(), which seems daft.
fwiw, Modules/_bsddb.c does exactly that.
Interesting. The problem with readline.c doing this is that it gets implicitly imported by the interpreter -- although only for interactive sessions. Maybe that's not that big a deal. I'd still prefer to change the functions (would updating the PEP be in order here? Obviously, I'd update the api documentation).
Is there a good reason to *not* call PyEval_InitThreads when using a threaded Python? Sounds like it would just be easier to implicitly call it during Py_Initialize some day.
-bob
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
