On 25 apr 2005, at 16.14, Terry Reedy wrote:
with <target> as <value>:

would parallel the for-statement header and read smoother to me.

for <target> as <value>:

would not need new keyword, but would require close reading to distinguish
'as' from 'in'.

But it also moves the value to the right, removing focus. Wouldn't "from"
be a good keyword to overload here?


"in"/"with"/"for"/"" <value> from <target>:
    <BODY>

//Simon

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to