[ Simon Percivall ]: > [ Terry Reedy ]: > > with <target> as <value>: > > > > would parallel the for-statement header and read smoother to me. > > > > for <target> as <value>: > > > > would not need new keyword, but would require close reading to > > distinguish > > 'as' from 'in'. > > But it also moves the value to the right, removing focus. Wouldn't > "from" > be a good keyword to overload here? > > "in"/"with"/"for"/"" <value> from <target>: > <BODY>
I do not have strong feelings about this issue, but for completeness sake... Mixing both suggestions: from <target> as <value>: <BODY> That resembles an import statement which some may consider good (syntax/keyword reuse) or very bad (confusion?, value focus). cheers, Senra -- Rodrigo Senra -- MSc Computer Engineer rodsenra(at)gpr.com.br GPr Sistemas Ltda http://www.gpr.com.br/ Personal Blog http://rodsenra.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com