> > Should this maybe just be added to PEP 342? To me, PEP 342 has always > > seemed incomplete without ways to throw() and close(), but that could > > easily be just me. In any case I'd expect the implementation of > > 'next(arg)' to have some overlap with the implementation of 'throw()'. > > Maybe, but on the other hand this idea can be done independently from > PEP 342. After the "monster-PEP" 340, I'd rather break proposals up in > small parts.
+1 I want this as a separate PEP. It is a straight-forward solution to long standing issues. I would rather not have it contaminated with distracting issues and co-routine dreams. Raymond _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
