On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 10:56 +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Atsuo Ishimoto wrote:
> > I'm +0.1 for non-ASCII identifiers, although module names should remain
> > ASCII. ASCII identifiers might be encouraged, but as Martin said, it is
> > very useful for some groups of users.
>
> Thanks for these data. This mostly reflects my experience with German
> and French users: some people would like to use non-ASCII identifiers
> if they could, other argue they never would as a matter of principle.
> Of course, transliteration is more straight-forward.
Not sure if anyone has made this point already, but unicode
identifiers are also useful for math programs. The ability to directly
type the math letters, like alpha, omega, etc., would actually make the
code more readable, while still understandable by programmers of all
nationalities. For instance, you could write:
Δv = x1 - x0
if Δv < ε:
return
Instead of:
delta_v = x1 - x0
if delta_v < epsilon:
return
But anyone that is supposed to understand the code will be able to read
the delta and epsilon symbols.
Regards.
--
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The universe is always one step beyond logic
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
