Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Otherwise, not using the distributed aclocal.m4 may be possible, but > it's a bad idea.
That may not be so bad, actually. It looks like libffi's aclocal.m4 is not hand-written, but generated through aclocal(1). Not sure why this is done, but this seems to be the cause of the explicit mentionings of the GPL (the snippets that aclocal.m4 is generated from are each GPL-licensed, make the whole aclocal.m4 GPL-licensed). That said, I'm uncertain as to what the purpose of aclocal(1) is, so I might be wrong. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
