On 5/22/2018 8:37 AM, Andrew Svetlov wrote:
Sorry for that.
I thought that the bpo issue can be skipped because it is tests-only
change, no asyncio code was affected.
Will be more accurate next time.
A new issue was not needed. Adding 'bpo-33531' would have been fine,
automatically linking the issue and the PR in both directions.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
