On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I just read a recent bugfix in asyncio: > > https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9602643120a509858d0bee4215d7f150e6125468 > > + try: > + await waiter > + except Exception: > + transport.close() > + raise > > Why only catching "except Exception:"? Why not also catching > KeyboardInterrupt or MemoryError? Is it a special rule for asyncio, or > a general policy in Python stdlib? > > For me, it's fine to catch any exception using "except:" if the block > contains "raise", typical pattern to cleanup a resource in case of > error. Otherwise, there is a risk of leaking open file or not flushing > data on disk, for example.
Pardon the dumb question, but why is try/finally unsuitable? ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
