Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > Is there some kind of optimized communication possible yet between > subinterpreters? (Otherwise I still worry that it's no better than > subprocesses -- and it could be worse because when one > subinterpreter experiences a hard crash or runs out of memory, all > others have to die with it.)
The use case that I have in mind with subinterpreters is Windows. With its lack of fork() and the way it spawns a fresh interpreter process it always feels a bit weird to use multiprocessing on Windows. Would it be faster and/or cleaner to start a new in-process subinterpreter instead? _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/MVYVEDXIW24I5LX2RW26P3FVBBYIO6TT/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
