Le 14/10/2020 à 15:16, Pablo Galindo Salgado a écrit : > Hi! > > I have updated the branch benchmarks in the pyperformance server and now > they include 3.9. There are > some benchmarks that are faster but on the other hand some benchmarks > are substantially slower, pointing > at a possible performance regression in 3.9 in some aspects. In > particular some tests like "unpack sequence" are > almost 20% slower. As there are some other tests were 3.9 is faster, is > not fair to conclude that 3.9 is slower, but > this is something we should look into in my opinion. > > You can check these benchmarks I am talking about by: > > * Go here: https://speed.python.org/comparison/ > * In the left bar, select "lto-pgo latest in branch '3.9'" and "lto-pgo > latest in branch '3.8'" > * To better read the plot, I would recommend to select a "Normalization" > to the 3.8 branch (this is in the top part of the page) > and to check the "horizontal" checkbox.
Those numbers tell me that it's a wash. I wouldn't worry about a small regression on a micro- or mini-benchmark while the overall picture is stable. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/WMNBN4LI5W7U5HKPJWQOHGZXK4X3IRHV/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
