On 1/11/21 5:26 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,

There are multiple PEPs covering heap types. The latest one refers to
other PEPs: PEP 630 "Isolating Extension Modules" by Petr Viktorin.
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0630/#motivation

The use case is to embed multiple Python instances (interpreters) in
the same application process, or to embed Python with multiple calls
to Py_Initialize/Py_Finalize (sequentially, not in parallel). Static
types are causing different issues for these use cases.

If a type is immutable and has no references to heap-allocated objects, it could stay as a static type. The issue is that very many types don't fit that. For example, if some method needs to raise a module-specific exception, that's a reference to a heap-allocated type, because custom exceptions generally aren't static.


Also, it's not possible to destroy static types at Python exit, which
goes against the on-going effort to destroy all Python objects at exit
(bpo-1635741).

I don't see why we would need to destroy immutable static objects. They don't need to be freed.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/E6NSBPPMCJV5KPZCZJOLDAO74VUK25X6/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to