On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 16:48 Christopher Barker <python...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And as I noted in my last post — many folks have not been paying attention > to the typing discussions because they didn’t realize it concerned them. > It seems a little disingenuous to claim discussions about annotations don’t concern you when you’re actively using them (for typing, no less, in the case of pydantic). And I am sure a project as popular (by their own description) as pydantic will find a way forward if PEP 649 is rejected, despite overdramatized claims. That said, I agree it is better that this came up before the feature freeze than after the release. And I am willing to accept that the hypothetical future where annotations are not always syntactically expressions (which did not even exist before this week) is less important than backwards compatibility. -- --Guido (mobile)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/ZGRV3QHTKPFHMJY6R4Z7J7G3LPDTRA4O/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
