I don’t see what this simplifies. We still need to implement split, and to worry about wrapping or not wrapping BaseExceptions and we still need to define exception handling semantics (except/except*).
> On 20 Apr 2021, at 22:12, srku...@mail.de wrote: > > So, forgive me my relatively simple mental model about ExceptionGroup. I > still try to create one for daily use. > > As noted in the discussion, an EG provides a way to collect exceptions from > different sources and raise them as a bundle. They have no apparent relation > up until this point in time (for whatever reason they have been separate and > for whatever reason they are bundled now). The result would be a tree graph > in any case. > > A usual datastructure for a tree is to store all child nodes at the parent > node. > > That was the idea behind the content of BaseException.__group__: it’s the > list of child exceptions bundled at a specific point in time and raise as > such a bundle. So all exceptions could become EGs with the additional > semantics you‘ve described in the PEP. > > Illustrative Example: >>>> bundle_exc.__group__ > [IOError(123), RuntimerError(‘issue somewhere’)] > > I was wondering what of the PEP could be removed to make it simpler and more > acceptable/less confusing (also looking at reactions from Twitter etc.) and I > found these additional classes to be a part of it. Additionally, I fail to > see how to access these bundled exceptions in an easy manner like __cause__ > and __context__. (As the PEP also referring to them). So, I removed the > classes and added a regular attribute. > > The reason I brought this up what the section “rejected ideas” didn’t showed > anything in this direction (or I managed to missed that). > > Sven > >> >> On 20. Apr 2021, at 22:05, Irit Katriel <iritkatr...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Sven, >> >> I don’t follow. What would the value of __group__ be and how would it work? >> >> Irit >> >>>> On 20 Apr 2021, at 20:44, srku...@mail.de wrote: >>> >>> Hi Irit, >>> reading this subthread specifically, I just got a wild idea and I couldn‘t >>> find any related information in the PEP: >>> Why not extending BaseException by __group__ among __cause__ and >>> __context__? >>> Would this reduce some of the added complexity and thus increase broader >>> acceptance? >>> Cheers, >>> Sven > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/OJJXMPBD4ZUZOUZ2ULWT4Q6ULI75HLDE/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/