On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 3:49 PM Eric Snow <[email protected]> wrote: > I suppose I'd like to know what the value of _Py_IDENTIFIER() is for > 3rd party modules.
Between Guido, Victor, Stefan, and Sebastian, I'm getting the sense that a public replacement for _Py_IDENTIFER() would be worth pursuing. Considering that it would probably help numpy move toward subinterpreter support, I may work on this after all. :) (For core CPython we'll still benefit from the statically initialized strings, AKA gh-30928.) -eric _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/D2LHEZZUQH66Q5ZIOEJTGSCEMQEMKCUQ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
