Anthony Baxter wrote: > > Such a module name is less likely to cause problems. > > Excellent point. Hm. Maybe we should just go with 'sqlite', instead.
except that "sqlite" was the name used by the first pysqlite generation: $ python2.3 >>> import sqlite >>> sqlite.version '1.1.6' I'm not sure how much trouble reusing this name would cause, but I'm quite sure the amount of trouble is larger than "none at all". </F> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
