I suggest to ignore this thread. The OP seems clueless and the names are fine. Don't waste your time.
On 4/21/06, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > Dennis Heuer wrote: > >> Module names > >> like hashlib are not python-like too (too c/lowlevel-like). > > > > I agree with Greg: hashlib is a Pythonic name for a module, > > just like httplib, mhlib, xmlrpclib, cookielib, contextlib, > > difflib, ... > > > > OTOH, it might be indeed that the ctypes name need to be > > aligned with naming conventions. > > > > Personally, I *like* the ctypes name. But I'm open for suggestions, > and it might have intersting consequences if the Python core package > would be renamed to something else. > > Any suggestions? > > Thomas > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
