Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: > With the introduction of the xmlcore package in Python 2.5, should we > document > xml.etree or xmlcore.etree? If someone installs PyXML with Python 2.5, I > don't think they're going to get xml.etree, which will be really confusing. > We can be sure that xmlcore.etree will be there.
I think it would be unfortunate if an external, mostly unmaintained package could claim absolute ownership of the xml package root. how about tweaking the xml loader to map "xml.foo" to "_xmlplus.foo" only if that subpackage really exists ? </F> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
