Fuzzyman wrote: > I've often found it a nuisance that you can't instantiate an 'object', > to use as a mutable 'namespace', but instead have to define an arbitrary > empty class. > > What happened to the 'namespace' proposal ?
The code and the pre-PEP [1] are still out there, but Carlos, Steve and I all got distracted by other things. It really needs to go back to c.l.p to thrash out some of the name collision prblems (e.g. should *all* access to methods, even special methods, be via type(x)?). Cheers, Nick. [1] http://namespace.python-hosting.com/wiki/NamespacePep -- Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
