Hi Tim,
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 08:37:46PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Thomas Wouters]
> > Why not just "... && x == LONG_MIN"?
> it's better (when possible) not to tie the code to that `x` was
> specifically declared as type "long" (e.g., just more stuff that will
> break if Python decides to make its short int of type PY_LONG_LONG
> instead).
The proposed "correct fix" breaks this goal too:
> >> "if (y == -1 && x < 0 && (unsigned long)x == -(unsigned long)x)".
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A bientot,
Armin
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
