"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Tew schrieb: > > but at that stage I need to > > poll two different resources for events. In order to avoid this it makes > > sense to stop using asyncore for sockets and to write a new > > replacement socket object based on IO completion ports. > > I don't know whether/how this is possible. The underlying > WaitForMultipleObjects routine does not accept WinSock objects, > to my knowledge (perhaps it does in Vista, with the rewriting > of WinSock?).
It "works" in Windows 2000. I've got a variant of a prototype (and abandoned) Twisted Reactor that uses WaitForMultipleObjects for an alternate asyncore.poll() implementation on Windows. It sucks up 100% processor when sending trivial amounts of data from a single socket (where asyncore uses about 2%), but you do get the data. - Josiah _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
