Is anyone interested in seeing PEP 3115 (Metaclasses in Python 3000, ) backported to 2.6? Actually, I guess I am interested, so perhaps I should ask 'does anyone see any objection to it being backported'? Of course there should be full backward compatibility in 2.6, but I don't see any issue preventing that, right now.
(I was actually working on backporting the new super() (incorrectly described in PEP 3135) which builds on top of PEP 3115; I can backport without PEP 3115 but it would be a waste if we then backported 3115 after all.) -- Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
