On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:28 PM, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:06:05PM -0800, Brett Cannon wrote: > > I think Martin is right that someone needs to take the lead and do a > > complete review of how issues are handled. That way we can do a change > > in one big batch to something that works better for Python. > > Are we, as a development community, really running into problems with > how we handle bugs? There are certainly small cleanups possible, such > as dropping the 'postponed' and 'later' resolutions that we don't seem > to use very much, but the flow seems reasonably efficient to me. >
It's reasonable, but I wonder if it could be better. I am not sure as I have not had that much time to sit down and really think it through. I do know, though, that I like how Django has it structured: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/contributing/#ticket-triage . -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
