-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 19, 2008, at 3:20 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
> +1 to assert* from me. the fail* variants always feel like > double-negatives. I also always use assertTrue instead of assert_. But > I don't care enough to argue about it. :) I'm in the camp that Gabriel describes. I prefer assertEqual/ assertRaises and failIf/failUnless. I like the latter because it reads nicely: fail unless [this thing is true], fail if [this thing is true]. OTOH, I'd rather there be OOWTDI so whatever the consensus is is fine with me. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBR+EbBXEjvBPtnXfVAQIWDAQAi3/aoOhxeeeY85J4GEAW8hk3ONBQTUi8 jSdm62ooDndcuROZbC2EqfEGJJvX/JnbwstT195HD1EpsOohtA9tObZ294BO5vpg 4lEQhqqXlkQsZEgwM6+pcW8xUI3mv0HPiT/HZZZj/+71FpToSElist/l/sLYIvZv At7qT4DFKeo= =jyxp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
