On 31/05/2008, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/5/30 Farshid Lashkari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I'm not sure if there will be any side affects to modifying >> sys.executable though. Should this be the official way of supporting >> embedded interpreters or should there be a >> multiprocessing.setExecutable() method? > > +1 for setExecutable (I'd prefer set_executable, to be PEP 8 > compliant). Make it explicit, rather than fiddling with stuff in sys > manually.
That is easy to do. An issue not mentioned in the PEP is naming conventions. In recent versions I have tried to consistently use mixedCase for functions and methods (other than factory functions) because that is what threading does (give or take settrace(), setprofile(), stack_size().) I am certainly open to using lowercase/lower_case_with_underscores for all functions/methods except for Process's methods and possibly currentProcess(), but I would like some feed back on that. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
