On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Benjamin Peterson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Also - we could leave in stubs to match the threading api - Guido, David >>> Goodger and others really prefer not to continue the "broken" API of the >>> threading API >> I agree that the threading the the pyprocessing APIs should be PEP 8 >> compliant, but I think 2 APIs is almost worse than one wrong one. >> > > I disagree. If you state upfront that one of them is only for > backwards-compatibility/transitioning and will be going away in the > future, then I think it is fine to have the extra API.
In that case, I'm +1 as long as we implement a full DeprecationWarning on one. > > -Brett > -- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.1." _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
