On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > a while back there was a discussion about new operators for the language, > which > ended in people mentioning that the status of PEP 225 was still undecided and > that it was the most likely route to consider in this discussion. I offered > to collect some feedback from the numerical and math/scientific computing > communities and report back here.
I've only used a bit of numpy, but I have to say, the ~*/etc. syntax looks extremely ugly. There doesn't really seem to be a solution to this that isn't ugly in some way, but the op(a, b) version looks best to me (I also think a.op(b) is out of the question). -- Cheers, Leif _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
