Guido van Rossum wrote: [...] > > Finally, to those who claim that 2.6 is a mess because multiprocessing > wasn't perfectly stable at introduction: that's never been the > standard we've used for totally *new* features. It's always been okay > to add slightly immature features at a major release, as long as (a) > they don't break anything else, and (b) we can fix things in the next > release while maintaining backward compatibility. > There's a large distance between saying its introduction was ill-advised and that 2.6 is a mess. I certainly never intimated such a thing (I said it was "a rushed release"). Did anyone?
Of course we can fix it. Of course 2.6 is great. regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
