>> It's unclear, however, who is using base packages besides mx.* and >> ll.*, although I'd guess from the PyPI listings that perhaps Django >> is. (It seems that "base" packages are more likely to use a >> 'base-extension' naming pattern, vs. the 'namespace.project' pattern >> used by "pure" packages.) > > I'll stress it again in case you missed it the first time: I think the > main reason people use "pure namespace" versus "base namespace" packages > is because hardly anyone know how to do the latter, not because there is > no desire to do so! > > I, for one, have been trying to figure out how to do "base namespace" > packages for years...
You mean, without PEP 382? That won't be possible, unless you can coordinate all addon packages. Base packages are a feature solely of PEP 382. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
