> > Do the users get any say in this?
>
> I'm a user! :-)
>
> I hate calling methods on string literals, I think it looks very odd
> to have code like this:
>
> "Displaying {0} of {1} revisions".format(x, y)
Ugh! Good point.
Is Python to be an easy-to-learn-and-remember language? I submit we are losing
that one. To a user, this will be confusing. To a C programmer coming over to
Python, especially so. Some of what makes %-formatting easy to remember is its
parallel in C.
I'm conflicted. Philosophically I like the idea of mnemonic names over
positional variables and allowing variable values determined elsewhere to be
inserted in print strings. It is appealing.
Unless the benefit is at least 2x, a change should not be made, and I don't
think this benefit rises to where it is worth the confusion and problems.
...and converting the legacy base. And forget pretty, not that %-formatting is
pretty either. Besides, according to the bench, it is slower too. And it will
take editors a while before the new syntax is supported and colorized, thus
some errors for a while.
...and if one wants a "{" or a "}" in the printed output, one has to escape it?
That is -2x over wanting a "%" in the output.
So until I see a *significant* benefit, my vote is *not* remove %-formatting.
Make both available and if {} is to win, it will.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
