Guido van Rossum wrote:
> \>> I hate calling methods on string literals, I think it looks very odd
>>> to have code like this:
>>>
>>> "Displaying {0} of {1} revisions".format(x, y)
>> Ugh! Good point.
>
> This objection was made years ago when we introduced
> "separator".join(list_of_things), and I don't think ignoring it has
> caused any casualties. In fact, it serves as an early reminder to the
> user that string literals are, in fact, objects like all others.
The other string literal method I personally use reasonably often is to
create lists of strings by using "a list of strings".split() instead of
['a', 'list', 'of', 'strings'] (while the character count isn't all that
different, I find the former is easier to both write and read without
all those quotes and commas). It's a trick I've seen plenty of other
people use as well.
So I would agree that method invocation on literals (particularly string
literals) is an already established language idiom.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
