Hi Ben, On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> writes: > >> Ben Finney wrote: >> > "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> writes: >> > >> >> Well, 3to2 would then be an option for you: use Python 3 as the >> >> source language. >> > >> > I was under the impression that 2to3 was officially supported as >> > part of Python, but 3to2 was a third-party tool. […] Is it an >> > official part of Python? >> >> No, the status is exactly as you describe it. > > Okay. It's probably best for anyone with their Python developer hat on > (which, in this forum, is all the time for any Python developer) to make > the status of 3to2 clear when recommending it to people concerned about > future plans.
Are you implying that we shouldn't recommend 3to2 to people wanting to develop in Py3k and back-translate to 2.x? Thanks, Collin Winter _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
