On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like this wording far more. It's at the very least far more precise. > Those examples are fair enough (except the fact that PyPy is not 32bit > x86 only, the JIT is). [snip] > "slower than US on some workloads" is true, while not really telling > much to a potential reader. For any X and Y implementing the same > language "X is faster than Y on some workloads" is usually true. > > To be precise you would need to include the above table in the PEP, > which is probably a bit too much, given that PEP is not about PyPy at > all. I'm fine with any wording that is at least correct.
I've updated the language: http://codereview.appspot.com/186247/diff2/9005:11001/11002. Thanks for the clarifications. Collin Winter _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
