Le mardi 23 mars 2010 à 20:50 -0400, Isaac Morland a écrit : > > I'm sure Greg will jump in if I'm wrong about what he is saying, but the > benefit to me and to Greg and to others writing .py code is that our > directories will contain *.py and __pycache__, rather than *.py and *.pyc. > So it will be much easier to see what is actually there.
I don't really get it. I have never had any problem to see "what is actually here" in a Python source directory, despite the presence of pyc files. > Or if we're using SVN and we do "svn status", the only spurious result > will be "? __pycache__" rather than "? X.pyc" for every X.py in the > directory. Well, I was assuming that everyone had been using svn:ignore, or .hgignore, for years. Similarly, you will configure svn, hg, or any other system, to ignore __pycache__ directories (or .pyc files) so that they don't appear in "svn status". > Directory tidiness is a positive general feature with at least a few > specific benefits. It's still mostly cosmetic and I don't think it's as serious as any positive or negative system administration effects the change may have. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
