Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >> Huh? Last time I looked weren't we going to make __pycache__ the >> default (and eventually only) behavior? > > We definitely agreed it would be the default in Python 3.2. > > My recollection is that we agreed it would be the only on-demand way of > writing pyc files, but that Python would read a lone .pyc file where the > source would be if the source is missing, and that py_compile/compileall would > support optional creation of those lone .pyc files.
Yep, that's my recollection as well. I don't recall seeing an update to state that clearly in the PEP go by on the checkins list though :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
